In the past a typical family consisted of a energise who went out to cipher and a m a nonher(prenominal) who stayed at home(a) and looked after the children. Nowadays, it is the norm for some(prenominal) parents to work. This situation can depend children both positively and negatively. Some people think that the children of working(a) parents are in an advantageous position where their parents are toler suitable to afford mere luxuries such(prenominal) as new clothes, flick games or mobile phones. Proponents of this view argue that children are able to enjoy and experience more from life due to their parents event wealth, for example, by going on foreign holidays. On the other hand, however, there are those who claim that when both parents work, their children do non guide enough prevail and attention, meaning that the children might not do as thoroughly at school because there is no one at house to provide support with such things as homework or exam re vision. The absence of a parent at home could make it easier for children to get touch on in such things as drugs or compress drinking.
When I was growing up, both my parents worked and I was always well provided for. On the other hand, I think that it would sometimes invite been reveal if I could have seen more of my parents. In conclusion, I look at that we cannot change the fact that both parents have to work nowadays. It is not an ideal situation, but if parents make time for their children in the evenings and at the weekends, then the children will not suffer in both way. It must be stated that the extra income generated by both parents worki! ng, makes for a much higher standard of quick which benefits the in all family.If you want to get a full essay, ordination it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment